测试了下verysimple的quic协议
服务器端
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 |
[[listen]] protocol = "vlesss" uuid = "your-uuid" host = "0.0.0.0" port = 4434 insecure = true advancedLayer = "quic" alpn = ["h3"] early = true extra = { congestion_control = "hy", mbps = 3000 } [[dial]] protocol = "direct" |
客户端
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 |
[[listen]] protocol = "socks5" host = "0.0.0.0" port = 10800 [[dial]] protocol = "vlesss" uuid = "your-uuid" host = "your-quic-host" port = 4434 version = 0 insecure = true advancedLayer = "quic" alpn = ["h3"] tls = true early = true extra = { congestion_control = "hy", mbps = 3000 } |
在一台aws的t2.nano机器上的测速结果
verysimple-vless1 VS verysimple-quic
hysteria VS verysimple-quic
使用quic+hy确实对提升带宽有非常大的帮助
但是访问网页会出现掉包和加载失败的情况,关于这个问题待后续跟踪测试,因为纯hy并没有发现这个问题。
客户端开启hy和不开启hy
客户端开不开启hy看起来并没有什么区别,不开hy反而看起来会多消耗流量
There are no comments yet